I've got an historic map with oriented lines indicating fold hinges and a dip for each line. What's the best method to convert these lines into accurate structural data? Thank you!
Hi all, Is there a recommendation to have a faster topography import? Assuming a similar resolution, which input is faster to import? Points Surface (as mesh) GIS Vector data Elevation grid Polylines Usually the processing get stuck for a while on the "topography interp" step. Is there one format or or the other that is…
Hello Everyone, I’ve been working on a project that involves building a large-scale geological model using Leapfrog Geo, and I’m running into some challenges. I’m reaching out to tap into the collective expertise here and hopefully gain some insights or tips. My model incorporates multiple data sources, including extensive…
I have four seams (Veins) modeled from 2D cross-sections, as shown in the attached image. In my geological model, I’ve introduced two faults: F.A and F.KT4. However, these faults do not intersect all coal seams. Specifically: Fault F.A only cuts the upper seam (Vein 1), Fault F.KT4 cuts the three lower seams (Veins 2, 3,…
Hi everyone, I am making some plan view layouts with structural data (basically making a map) but I cannot find a way to add the classical strike and dip symbols. I have the structural data plotted, but only as single lines with no indication of the dip direction. Is there a way to do this? Many thanks
I was given a closed mesh not made in Leapfrog and I would like to make a grade x thickness evaluation of. Is it possible to do a thickness evaluation of such a volume? I was hoping to follow this work flow: https://www.seequent.com/grade-thickness-contouring-in-leapfrog-geo/
I'm slicing often in plan view and I can't figure out how to always get the same rough dip azimuth when slicing - I'm either getting the desired dip azimuth or +180 to it. I always slice in the same direction - roughly North to South. I'm trying to avoid checking the dip azimuth and changing it when it's 180 degrees away…
Hi All, is there a way I can group faults by category (extension vs. thrusts etc.)? To avoid loading them all individually thanks.
I have a large point data set, where i manually created a category selection. Unfotunately, one colleague of mine reloaded the dataset into Leapfrog due to problems with appended data. I know lost my editable category selection. Fortunately, I did not lose the data itself, I could append the category to the reimported…
I have a drill hole that has two vein intersections. The hole starts in a dyke, exits for about 300 m and then goes back into it. I have selected the "Multiple vein intersections per hole" and generated a surface. However, when I try to edit the segments Leapfrog is treating the two segments as one, creating a long 300 m…
It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.