Connect with geoscience professionals, exchange ideas, and learn from others working across the industry.
Welcome to the Seequent community! Click here to get started.
Explore discussions around the Seequent tools you're currently using.
Quick tips, workflows, and practical ways to get more out of Seequent tools
Geophysical surveys represent a significant investment, yet survey design decisions are often based on historical practices or assumptions about target detectability. Even with the correct geophysical method, factors such as line spacing, sample interval, survey orientation, and sensor height can have a major impact on…
Stratigraphy controls many of the world’s most valuable mineral deposits. From sediment-hosted copper and uranium to coal, phosphates, iron formations, and chromite reefs, building strong stratigraphic models is fundamental to geological interpretation, resource evaluation, and exploration targeting. But while stratigraphy…
Check out the latest discussions in our community and hop in with your questions, thoughts, or insights!
This month, we’re heading to Yaoundé, Cameroon to meet Franck Igor Bapooh, a Geophysicist at SONAMINES, the National Mining Corporation of Cameroon. Franck works in applied geophysics for mineral exploration, with a focus on interpreting geophysical data and helping evaluate mineral exploration opportunities. He’s…
I'm looking for suggestions in conveying confidence in a fault model. We have about 20 faults modelled using the vein tool. Some have been modelled through every hole, and some only a few intercepts. We push these through and ignore the pinchouts for now. I'm looking for a way that adequately shows the confidence in these.…
Hello! I'm a new user to Oasis. I have a TMI TIFF (I don't have raw data, but TIFF, TFW and ISI Common Export in a folder) that I imported into oasis. I managed to apply the correct coordinate and area (size), the went on to do 1DV, then smoothed the 1DV using the 3X3 Symmetric Convolution. It all worked until this point.…
We're excited to announce the release of Connecting OpenGround to Leapfrog Works, a new course in the Connected Subsurface Geotechnical Workflow learning path. This course helps learners understand how ground investigation data moves from OpenGround into Leapfrog Works, and what happens to that data along the way. You'll…
I have set of GX's - all compiled correctly using latest Geosoft Desktop, but I have a strange error on using GXC with the new version - no issue on using first GRC (as "grc example.grc"), but on step 2: GXC ("gxc example.gxc") reports an error [Unable to run the Geosoft Preproccesor (GPP.EXE).] and just display the help…
Hello everyone, I would like to perform a time-lapse data inversion using the double difference method described by Bretaudeau et al. 2021 (https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab172) with RES2DINV. To do this, I would like to import the resistivity model from the T0 (baseline) data inversion as the initial model for the T+1 data…
it looks like some information missing in the download folder Finite Fault Initial Project like. I can't correct the designed fault using the vertices there are points. Even for creating the buffer the mesh is missing in the folder. I do not know if someone got that issue
We are incredibly excited to share some news that will help our educator community bring 3D geological modelling to life — without the extra workload. We’ve officially launched over 15 new Visible Geology teaching materials, available now on the Science Education Resource Center (SERC)! Why they’re so awesome: ✅…
Short version: Can I use Airborne QC extension methods through gxapi or gxpy? Longer version: So I have access to Oasis montaj's airborne QC extension as seen from this code (10107 = "Airborne Quality Control"): I am not, however, able to find any methods related to this extension neither in gxapi nor gxpy. Are they…
Je souhaiterais me spécialiser en modélisation et en estimation sur leapfrog Geo. Que faire ?
Hi, I am still learning how to use Leapfrog Geo properly. I am struggling to add actual values in a swath plot for a multi-domain block model. I can only see actual data from individual domains, not all actual values at once. I am using Leapfrog Geo 2026.1.1. I used the combined estimator to combine my domain estimates…
Is it best practice to always have polylines for editing your surface? I know in densely drilled areas snapping to datasets is enough, or is it? Background: There is a model I am updating with new drillholes.
What is the best way to model alteration? Is it by modeling it by categorical data or changing the categorical to numeric or still use the alteration intensity for the modeling?
What will a 249 coefficient savitzki-golay convolution filter looks like? Anybody calculated the coefficients?
It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
