Best Of
Re: measurement conventions structural geology
I agree with the other posters. A dip setting would be welcomed, as would be a toogle to change the east/west flipping
Re: Do the "height" units in layers tab equate to model grid scale??
Thanks for the honest feedback!!
We know the changes can be a bit of a shift, especially when you’ve got go-to activities that used to work well. We’ll keep your input in mind as we continue to improve.
And, please, if you’ve got more thoughts, we’re always happy to hear them!
Re: Do the "height" units in layers tab equate to model grid scale??
Great question!
The grid beneath the cube is a custom scale that was created to resemble the layout from the previous version of the application. It doesn’t currently correspond to the height values or other numerical settings in the app. That said, you are right, and it would be beneficial to align these elements more closely in future updates to improve clarity and consistency.
I will log this as an idea for future enhancements. Thank you.
Re: How to adjust geological layer/surface to follow topography pattern
The 'offset surface' tool is your friend here. New deposit/erosion > from offset surface. Does exactly what you want.
🚀 Leapfrog 2025.2 introduces a powerful new way to work with core imagery for clients with Imago
Now, you can stream core photos and scans directly into Leapfrog – no more importing large files or switching between apps.
With Leapfrog 2025.2, you can:
- View imagery on demand, keeping projects lean and performance fast.
- See drilling intervals in context, with core imagery highlighted directly in the 3D scene.
- Compare multiple imagery types side-by-side to support clearer interpretation and decision-making.
👉 If you’re using Imago with Leapfrog, try out the new core imagery streaming and tell us what you think!
measure tool
Hello. The old version of Visible Geology had a "measure" tool - for example, to measure the apparent thickness of a tilted layer on the surface of the model. Does this "measure" tool not exist in the new version? Thanks
Re: Slope W (student version) - multiple analysis in one project
Hi @SelvaGounder, you can have two SLOPE/W analyses in one gsz file with a student license.
Re: Why the factor of safety increase due to the boundary effect?
Hi @ShishirKumarSikderAm, I can see in your screenshots that your entry and exit ranges are different in the two cases, which means that all the conditions are not the same. I would recommend keeping the entry and exit ranges the same in both cases, and checking to make sure all of the other variables are the same such as slope angle and material properties. If you are using the results from a SEEP/W analysis for your pore water pressure conditions, check the results of those for each geometry to to see if they're different.
If you're still getting this large of a discrepancy after checking everything, please submit a ticket here so we can take a look:
Re: Oasis - UXO Marine
Hi there,
I have experience processing UXO marine data, as I do give training for this at Seequent. Did you have a specific question about processing?
Best,
Laura
